Infrastructure growth inadequate?

Infrastructure capacity over-stretched in India?

India’s infrastructure, meaning Ports, Roads, airports, and railways, are they sufficient to meet the burgeoning demand of the economic growth of the Country which is expected to emerge as one of the largest economies of the World in a few year’s time?

Is India’s growth commensurate with the growth in automobile, bus, motor vehicle, two wheelers, three wheelers, four wheelers, six wheelers, and giant trucks that move Containers, passenger growth in trains, aero planes, and Container traffic through ports?

Has the Planning Commission estimated the normal growth and superfluous growth, and arrived at the forecasts that would accurately predict the demand: Supply? Year-on-Year, the Finance Ministers have worried about raising expenditure, bridging the gap, collecting taxes, and focusing on bringing down the fiscal deficit, and allotting a chunk of money for populist schemes with the Vote banks in view. Is there any sincerity in their spending for the downtrodden? Is it aimed at making their standard of living grow? With all the spending, the have-nots increase in geometrical progression. Why? Faint and half hearted attempts to give an impression that the Government looks at an egalitarian Society, when Laws are framed and passed to assist the rich grow to figure in the Forbes List!

You cannot plan growth of rural areas by experimenting with examples. Gross root economics is not what is visualized in the theories of master economists. Even Hayward and London School economists failed to come up with an alternate strategy when the world economy led by America and Europe fretted and fumed?

The Central Government can wash off its hands saying that Road Transport is a state subject. That is why, when they raise the price of petrol or diesel, they tell states to reduce the Commercial/Sales Tax. But it is a fact that the vehicle population, both existing and new, is out of proportion to the available infrastructure. India hardly spends 4% of the GDP when China allocates 9% of the GDP for infrastructure growth. Infrastructure capacity is wholly inadequate rather inconsistent. The supply has not picked momentum against demand. Sector has not achieved the growth commensurate with its potential. The Road usage should have been restricted to 70% of its capacity. In India, the Road capacity is stretched beyond 100%. Port capacities are extremely stretched which raise inefficiencies as the utilization has breached 100%. The traffic is growing at a Compounded Annual Growth rate of 20%, while new capacities created are sizably low. Strong domestic consumption and favourable demographies in terms of young working population in India has resulted in heavy growth of vehicles. To cite an example, the State Bank of India, Kerala Circle, (the smallest circle of the SBI in India) gave auto loans to the extent of Rs 354 Cr in 2009-10 against Rs 34 Cr in 2008-9. What is the percentage of increase? Can the roads in Kerala, limited as they are, accept this additional load?

Just to give comparative figures, the automobile population (including the two wheeler segment) in India during 1990-91 was 22 lakh against 8.59 Cr in 2008-9.

According to statistics provided by the Economic Survey (2009-10), 11,037 Kms of High way has been completed. The Survey says that 1, 45,000 Kms of rural roadways at a cost of Rs 37,000 Cr has been laid upto 2008-9. This year’s budget for the NHAI is Rs 6,972.47 by Cess Funds collected from petrol & diesel users. The Government concedes that it underwrites under-recoveries to the extent of Rs 20,000 Cr. The Cess collected through compulsory taxation is 30% of the under-recoveries. Government should explain that when such is the case, how they can say mathematically the oil Companies are in the red, even after an upward increase every three months. There is something wrong somewhere, taking into account IOC profit of Rs 10,000 Cr in 2008-9. This is a mathematical puzzle more complicated than Satyam. If we look at the budget of NHAI, Rs 6,942.47 Cr is collected through Cess, Rs 1515 Cr is ploughed by way of External assistance (in the form of grant & loan) Rs 379 Cr + Rs 1096.26 Cr borrowings, while the actual Government’s budgetary support is only Rs 159 Cr. Mr Kamalnath is right that when the planning commission coughs up just Rs 159 Cr through budgetary support while the Ministry’s fixture is to lay 20 Kms of highway totaling 7,000 Kms of national Highway per annum. That is to say Government spends Rs 2, 27,142.85 to build 1 km of National Highway.

Private Sector invested 19% of the total plan outlay as participation in the Highway Development Programme, while it has grown to 30% in the XI Plan. Only in the building of Roads, PPP has risen from 5% to 36%.

Term funding, both equity and debt, by Banks, is impossible for the simple reason that the gap in long term debt financing is largely due to asset: liability mismatch facing the Banking industry. Long term equity capacity is also difficult to come by. Permitting pension funds and insurance cos to invest in long term stabilized constructions like roads, directly and indirectly, would be cost effective. Indirect investment in infrastructure funds or creation of listed perpetual funds holding infrastructure assets where investors could invest with an annuity philosophy may be explored. Foreign Exchange Reserves may be deployed for asset creation at little costs but with high returns. If Planning Commission goes on singing in chorus as to the whereabouts of the funds, even though the deployment is in unproductive and unwanted sectors, the infrastructure development will halt the country’s progress.

Finance Minister's Chicken & the Egg Econometrics

On the one hand there is a clamour against price rise. On the other are various restrictions on imports. This way, prices will remain high and we will continue to see more and more tinkering with interest rates. The problem is that high interest rates raise the cost of capital and, therefore, discourage investment. When the rate of growth in investment reduces, growth suffers. Lower rates of growth are clearly unacceptable, so are high prices. But with high tariffs and high/vague protectionism, we will not be able to help neither the slowdown in growth nor increase in domestic prices.

Look at the recent hike on June 25, 2010 in Petroleum prices. The increase was (+) Rs 3.50 for petrol, (+) Rs 2/- for diesel, Rs 3/- more for kerosene, and (+) Rs 35/- per LPG Cylinder. The increase is across the board. According to Government, subsidizing Petrol companies which show book profits on sales price of petrol + Government subsidies which causes 5 digit profits cannot be afforded by the nation. The subsidy burden is transferred to the people, whom the Government feels, have paying capacity so that vulnerable sections who do not have paying capacity can be helped through specialized subsidy schemes. India is after all a benign socialist democracy. Economic pundits and intellectual economists who have been advising the Government have averred that the hike in petroleum products will have an impact less than 1% on headline inflation which is hovering around 10.16% making it rise to 11%. The disparity between the Wholesale Price Index and Consumer price Index which was very high has been narrowed down, and the food inflation has been brought down to 12.92% from 16%. To further counter check inflation, RBI has increased the repo and reverse repo rates which today stand at 5.5% and 4% respectively.

The Finance Minister’s cautious budget had placed fiscal deficit at 5.5% of the GDP. His expenditure was estimated at Rs 11.09 lakh Crore, while tax and non tax revenue were expected to yield the state Rs 6.82 lakh Crore. Fiscal deficit for 2009-10 was 6.9%. Rolling targets for fiscal deficit for 2011-12 and 2012-13 has been expected to come down to 4.8%. Very commendable progressive budget compared to the deficit finance budget of earlier years. Forget, it was the Congress that ruled the country and the Finance minister was from one of its ranks.

Who said that the Public Distribution System is not in order? The 57% of the targeted 652.03 lakh Below Poverty Line people are covered for which an outlay of Rs 64,929 Cr was ear-marked. The Government has fixed Central Issue Prices (CIP) for APL at the purchase price of FCI, so that BPL could be supplied at 50%of FCI’s economic cost. But with all this spending the incidence of poverty should have come down. But it has gone up. Government wants to preserve money for the Food Security Programme to obliterate poverty by providing one square meal a day. Already 100 days compulsory employment programme has emancipated the capacity of many, claims Government. There are many who want to remain ‘voluntarily’ unemployed. These people are in the ‘you can take horse to water but cannot make it drink’. According to the study conducted by Dr B K Chaturvedi Committee, it was found that 39% of PDS was diverted and 18% reached the hands of those who used it for adulterating petrol. The Committee also observed that rural use of kerosene for lighting has come down to 40% to 51%, and hardly 1% is used by BPL families for cooking purposes. A shock assessment was that 24% of rural consumption going to states for lighting where there is 100% electrification. Often kerosene oil reaches the hands of the unintended. The difference between APL and BPL prices provide strong incentives for illegal diversions to the market. The number of BPL families varies according to the State list, Planning Commission figures, NCAER, etc. A new study-the multidimensional poverty index(MPI)- by Oxford Poverty and Human Development-UNDP initiative revels that there are 421 million MPI poor spread across Bihar, Chittisgarh, Jharkhand, MP, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal(in India) compared to 410 million in the 26 poorest African countries put together. The MPI assesses poverty on the deprevations on a host of key factors. How can BPL inspite of heavy subsidizing multiply? Is Malthusian theory at work?

The prices of vegetables and other food items have been going up steadily. The manufacturing growth has been accelerating. Share market is steadily galloping. However, there is a short term shift is noticed from equity and reality markets to risk free, capital guaranteed deposits in India. This is the reason, that despite the purchasing power among the middle class, white collared, ethnic population, etc, invest in Fixed Deposits though the returns are marginal having eroded due to government’s wild fetched theory of low interest regime. When interest is lower than inflation, it is not a healthy sign, forgot the Economics studied rulers and advisors in the Government.

Surpringly for Government, Spectrum auction brought Rs 70,000 Cr to its coffers. Petroleum hike reduced the subsidy burden on the Government. Base rate will enable the Banks to squeeze the common man, advantage multinationals, so that more paper interest will accrue, and the balance sheet will be green. Even though all the bank top executives shook their head together when an internal committee of RBI had recommended replacement of erstwhile BPLR system with base rate regime. Now Bankers started having second thoughts. If the borrower refused to accept the ‘base rate’, there would be two set of interest bearing loan accounts- one with the old rate, and one with the base rate. The bankers have requested RBI to add a sunset clause to its earlier notification asking banks to benchmark lending rates on the base rate effective from 1 July 2010. It was announced that the RBI will give the Banks an extension of a year to follow the base rate. Should not the notification anticipate legal problems, before the announcement? Government bodies become wise after the event. That is what Harshad Mehta taught the Government. Limping export sector is grouping in the dark, awaiting Domiciles Sword at any time. Half of the Stimulus outlay will be removed says grapevine from Delhi. That would add to available surplus. Finance Minister has already announced disinvestment to the tune of Rs 24,000 Cr. Another shedding of 2.5% in the nationalized Banks, Insurance Companies and navaratnas would easily fetch him Rs 25,000 Cr. With all these monies on his chest, the Finance Minister is sitting on a chest of money. If P Chidambaram can write off Rs 70,000 Cr as farm loan waiver, why can’t his successor do much more? Provide Food Stability to the extent of Rs 1, 00,000 Cr?


Has the Finance Minister heard of Nils Gilman, who authored the ‘Deviant Globalization theory?’ In our economy, there are illegal unrecorded transactions like flow of unaccounted money, black money transactions in financial, real estate, energy, drugs, organs, hawala transactions, which can torpedo meticulous planning in the controlled economy. Swiss Bank accounts? Every body promises to bring the money, but nobody has. We need to vigilantly and vigorously pursue the agenda that we have written. Finance Minister should be slow when undertaking the exercise of taxation which he thinks is the only way to bring sunshine to India’s fragile economy, a philosophy exploded by Dr Montek Singh Aluwahlia at the Devil’s Advocate programme.

Contradictions in Planning

Indian economy has withstood the torrential economic crisis of 2007-9. That is what the Government wants us to believe. Double dip growth cruve, we are at the fag end of the curve, and what remains is an inclined growth. It is raining cats and dogs, and our agricultural growth looks promising. In the end of the last fiscal, contrary to the Planning Commission’s expected growth of (-) 0.20% while, the agricultural growth posted (+) 0.20%. Quite often, planning commission’s growth figures are not only wrong but goes astray notwithstanding that they are only supposed to Plan, write the guidelines, question the achievable or non progress made. A project is included it in the
Plan, but the Commission is unable to ear-mark actual outlays due to funds’ volatility or shortage. Like sure sciences, economic planning is subject to rational or irrational human behaviour which can be contradictory to what could have been imagined. What are Plans? Mere estimates or one’s real assessment of growth, development in mathematical form.

The Union Finance Minister when he unveiled the budget, pictured a scenario of modest to good growth based on his premise that the world economy was growing, blooming, and zooming. However, in view of the carry over of the crisis-riddled economy, he had to impose certain taxes, increase certain surcharges, maintain the equilibrium in some areas, be considerate in some other areas, and be tight fisted in areas where lot of help has been given. The first step was when the prices of petroleum products were increased in March. The feeble voice of the Opposition, who became men of straw, did not have the vigour to shout. Hence kept quiet. Emboldened by this silence, again, on June 25, the Group of Minsiters (like the proverbial monkeys- see me not, hear me not, no speak) decided to increase the petroleum prices at the rate of Rs 3.50 per petrol, Rs 2.00 per diesel, Rs 3/- per kerosene and Rs 35 per LPG Cyclinder. Government’s argument was, though the oil companies showed profit in their balance sheets, it was factoring the subsidy given by government, which was causing a drain on the exchequer. Why not use it for some more productive exercises. And even after this added pricing, the inflation would enhance by less than 1%. Headline inflation was 10.16%, which government corrected as 11%, while food inflation touched 12.92% falling from 16%. No doubt, ONGC got a whopping Rs 5,400 Cr by way of bonanza because of this raise while Oil India’s additional income is expected to rise by Rs 800 Cr. In addition government got a share of central levies at the raised prices. The Railways would incur heavy losses while gas based power would have to incur an additional of Re 1/ unit (kWh).

The Fiscal deficit envisaged by the Finance Minister was 5.5% of GDP. He had budgeted an expenditure of Rs 11.09 lakh crore, while tax and non tax revenue was expected to yield Rs 6.82 lakh Cr. He had to resort to borrowing of Rs 3.81 lakh Crore. He was on a strong wicket, as his deficit pitched at 5.5%, while 2009-10 (6.8%) (revised 6.9%). The Finance Minister had proudly announced that the rolling targets for fiscal deficit was plugged at 4.8 %( 2011-12) & (2012-13). Finance Minister is in a tearing hurry to jump the fence.

We can heave a sigh of relief that our headline inflation (10.16%) and food inflation which dwindled to 12.92% from 16% have become even, after WPI and CPI had 10% difference between them. So leveling of the inflation, has given comfort to our Finance Ministry.

The first casualty of the guillotine of the stimulus was the Technology Upgradation Fund of the Textiles Ministry which has been withheld temporarily. He may cut down DEPB, reduce DDB, and other fiscal stimulus offered to various segments of Exports which did exceptionally well in spite of several shortcomings.

Under the targeted Public Distribution System, only 57% of the 652.03 lakh BPL families (up from 596.23 lakh) are covered by it. The amount of subsidies for food, fertilizer and petroleum is expected to be Rs 64,929 Cr. Central Issue price (CPI) for Above Poverty Line will be 100% of the commercial FCI’s commercial cost, while 50% subsidy was provided for Below Poverty Line people. The difference between APL and BPL prices provide strong incentives for illegal diversions to the market. The Government had identified BPL families through select geographical targeting which they found unrealistic, hence abandoned.

Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Dy Chairman, Plg Commission when questioned the rationale, replied that the Government is not supposed to subsidize the oil companies. Somebody has got to pay for it (cheaper kerosene and LPG) - either through general revenues or from jacking up petrol prices. Subsidies need to be utilized for building schools, education, hospital, etc. He candidly said that people building roads should have knowledge of building roads, while Planning Commission members provided guidelines, econometrics, and implementation strategy. But the implementation was by some other body. He concurred that the Planning Commission had targeted 7000 Kms of National Highways @ 20 kms per day. But funds have to be found for it. He said regarding building of Delhi Airport, the role of the Commission was just selecting the Operator.

Regarding the point that under Road Transport, Planning Commission had targeted 7000 Kms of national highways without allocating funds would mean that the non availability of planned allocation would halt the project. There cannot be discussions on it. Secondly, the Planning Commission deputy chief should be aware that around Rs 70,000 Cr were pumped to the Government account by the Spectrum auction. The expected and anticipated bringing down of stimulus for sectors which had done well last year, would yield another Rs 50,000 Cr. Already the announcement of ‘base rate’ would help the Banks to mobilize more money and more income, which would be pro rata given back to the Government as dividend. India accounts for about 20% of remittance to developed countries. Overseas investment to India is directed at not the share markets and real estate markets, but to risk-free capital guaranteed deposits in India. That is why, Banks deposit base is soaring in spite of poor RoI (Return-on-Investment). If Indian Oil Corporation has been patronized through subsidies and if they had made profits to the extent of Rs 10,220 Cr in 2009-10, how much of it was granted to government by way of dividend. In Rs 10,220 Cr, what was the percentage of subsidy that the Government shelled out? Dr B K Chaturvedi Committee appointed by the Plg Commission has clearly pointed out that subsidy for BPL families in 100% electrified villages found way to black market, and 26% of the total kerosene was used to adulterate diesel, what action did the Planning Commission or Government of India do? If the Plg Commission was so concerned for money, why are they importing Crude Palm oil at ‘nil’ Customs duties and edible palm oil at 7.5% which account for a loss of income to the tune of Rs 24,000 Cr. Further 3 lakh tones of Palmoil is distributed through PDS by subsidizing 1 litre of Palm oil by Rs 15/- which amounts to around Rs 500 Cr. Planning Commission targets a growth rate, then mid-course changes it, and at the end of the year alters it, and what is achieved is a different percentage? How does Planning Commission Deputy Chairman endorse this? Accountability rests with the Commission. It cannot absolve/abdicate itself of the responsibility. If Planning Commission should consist of Accountants only, why put intellectuals, economists, scientists, thinkers, sociologists, and pay astronomical sum to them? Better disband Plg Comm?